Let's Hear It for the Losers!
By J. Barton Starr History News Service
As Al Gore and George W. Bush fight out these final days
in their battle for the presidency, the arrival of my
Florida absentee ballot with its list of nine presidential
candidates reminded me that it is time to praise the great
presidential losers of the American past.
Yes, the time has come for all true lovers of trivia to
stand up and be counted for the losers. In the spirit of
the Millard Fillmore Society, whose basic purpose is to
preserve the anonymity of President Millard Fillmore, let
all the perpetual pursuers of petty phenomena take note of
this foray into insignificance. Both gone and forgotten,
second-place finishers in the presidential sweepstakes
remind us that the pursuit of ideals, fought heroically
against insurmountable odds, is worth the effort, even if it
only warrants a footnote in history.
Several years ago the editorial page of a daily newspaper
stated that with William Jennings Bryan's third unsuccessful
race for the presidency in 1908, a record was set: "neither
before nor since has anybody been defeated for the
presidency three times." Alas, how soon we forget!
Two other "major party" candidates suffered a similar
fate. Counting only his attempts to attain the presidency as
a major candidate, between 1800 and 1808 Charles Cotesworth
Pinckney lost three times as the nominee of the Federalist
Party. For the true devotee of trivia, it should be noted
that he also received one electoral vote in 1796, and
therefore lost four times.
The second, and more notable, "also-ran" was Henry Clay.
Clay was one of those unfortunate souls in American politics
bitten by the presidential bug who never recovered from the
consequent fever. He unsuccessfully attempted to gain the
presidency in 1824, 1832 and 1844. Clay also attempted to
win the Whig Party's nomination in 1840 because the
political experts felt that anybody could beat the
depression-plagued Democratic candidate Martin Van Buren
("Little Van, the Used-Up Man"). They were right; "anybody"
was nominated and eventually won the election; William Henry
Harrison ("Old Tippecanoe") served as president exactly one
month before dying of age, exhaustion and pneumonia.
If Clay felt betrayed, he would have a great deal of
company as a perennial also-ran. Other men ran for the
highest office in the land with luck equal to or even worse
than that of Pinckney or Clay. Who could ever forget
William Z. Foster who ran three times for the Workers' Party
and the Communist Party? Or how about that three-time
candidate of the Socialist Workers' Party, Farrell Dobbs?
Or the quadruple loser on the Socialist Labor Party ticket,
Eric Haas?
One of the more interesting all-time losers was prisoner
No. 2253 who in 1920 was serving a ten-year sentence for
violation of the Espionage Act. While in prison, Eugene V.
Debs ran for the fifth time for president as the Socialist
Party candidate and received nearly a million votes.
Together, Foster, Dobbs, Haas and Debs polled a combined
total of zero electoral votes.
The man who was the real winner of the losers was none of
these but the persistent Norman Thomas, who did more than
anyone else to put third-party losers on the political map
of the United States. Between 1928 and 1948 he headed the
Socialist Party ticket six times and received no electoral
votes.
There are other ways of counting losers besides looking
at the final outcome. Some candidates in American political
history not only lost, but lost spectacularly. William
Howard Taft served as president from 1909 until 1913, but in
the election of 1912 he suffered the worst defeat ever by an
incumbent president. His total: 8 of 531 electoral votes.
Other candidates shared Taft's fate in the electoral
count. In 1804 the perennial also-ran Charles Cotesworth
Pinckney received only 14 electoral votes in his bid to
unseat Thomas Jefferson. To find any other major party
candidate who suffered such humiliation, one has to look at
the 20th century. In his attempt to defeat the New Deal of
Franklin D. Roosevelt, Governor Alfred M. Landon received
only eight electoral votes. Richard Nixon handily defeated
George McGovern in 1972 when McGovern earned only 17
electoral votes out of a total of 537, still beating Walter
Mondale's total of 13 out of 538 in the election of 1984.
For there to be a winner in any election, obviously there
must also be at least one loser. The candidates mentioned
here joined the ranks of many other prominent men and are
distinguished only by the fact that they "lost big." It is
easy to belittle their campaigns, but remember that these
men were dedicated to their ideals and strove to attain the
presidency in order to implement them. In light of the
heroic record of these perpetual aspirants to the
presidency, the time is long past to give them the
recognition they deserve. Be it ever so late, with the
enthusiasm of the Procrastinators Society: Let's hear it for
the losers!
J. Barton Starr is associate vice president and academic
dean (humanities and social sciences); chair professor of
history; and director of international programs at Lingnan
University in Hong Kong.
[J. Barton Starr: Telephone: (852) 2616-8828; fax: (852)
2572-4484; e-mail: starr@ln.edu.hk.]
History News Service
Co-Directors:
Joyce Appleby: appleby@history.ucla.edu
Telephone: 310-470-8946
James M. Banner, Jr.: jbanner@aya.yale.edu
Telephone: 202-462-5655
Website designed and administered by Christopher
Bates.
This article was posted on October 17, 2000.
Pictured at top (left to right): King Henry VIII
of England, The Mayflower sails for America, Marie Curie,
Woodrow Wilson, Adolf Hitler, A protester faces off against
Chinese tanks at Tianenmen Square.
|